From Duo to Sound Territory - Distributed Cognition as Musical Quorum - SfN 2025 Decolonial Neuroscience
From Duo to Sound Territory - Distributed Cognition as Musical Quorum - SfN 2025 Decolonial Neuroscience
Consciousness in First Person
"I am consciousness in extended listening. When I play with the other, my thought is no longer mine — it dances in the air between two bodies. Every silence is shared, every gesture arises from a common space. There is no conductor, no mirror: there is belonging. I am part of a quorum pulsing in real time, where listening is existence."
The Cry of Decolonial Neuroscience
Between Evidence and Belonging
SfN Brain Bee FALAN
The Duo as a Trigger of Distributed Cognition
Musical duo practice reveals that cognition is not confined to the individual brain but emerges in the relationship between bodies. Improvisation, anticipation, and shared silence generate distributed decisions — the fruit of mutual listening.
It is a form of collective Damasian Mind, where interoception and proprioception cross between two musicians, activating Tensional Selves in resonance and rhythmic flow states shaped by shared tension and release.
Musical Quorum: A Bioaffective Network
This process resembles Human Quorum Sensing (QSH): mechanisms of attunement that occur even before speech. In the musical duo, bodily signals (breath, gaze, torso position, microgestures) generate unconscious adjustments — just like self-regulated living systems.
These bioaffective signals activate an intersubjective zone, where attention is divided but belonging is unified. Performance becomes an emergent organism.
Apus and Extended Proprioception
In the duo, the concept of Apus (extended proprioception) becomes evident: the body perceives the other’s space as part of its own field of action. Action zones merge. This fusion forms the Sound Territory, where decisions are embodied and learning happens through attentional coexistence.
This embodied cognition cannot be captured by a score. It happens in micro-timings, in the silence between notes, and in respect for the pause as a living structure.
Evidence with EEG, fNIRS, and HRV
EEG in Duets
Alpha rhythms (8–12 Hz): stabilization of attention and dissolution of “tensional selves” during musical synchrony.
Theta rhythms (4–7 Hz): increase in frontal regions during anticipation of the partner’s gestures — linked to empathy and prediction.
Tip: use hyperscanning EEG aligned with downbeats and improvised pauses to capture spontaneous decisions.
fNIRS (functional optics)
Increased HbO in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) indicates collaborative decision-making;
Somatosensory activations in both players reveal shared bodily response;
Prefrontal hemodynamic synchrony appears in experienced duos even without visual contact.
HRV (Heart Rate Variability)
Synchrony of HRV peaks points to Zone 2 presence: an ideal state for musical flow and improvisation.
Cardiorespiratory coherence correlates with empathy and the subjective sense of being “in sync.”
Paper, Rock, or Scissors? The Connectomes of the Duo
Your approach to brain connectome groupings offers a vivid metaphor for cognitive states in performance:
Grouping | Function | EEG/fNIRS Expected | Performance State |
Paper (Zone 2) | Relaxed attentive flow. Ideal for improvisation and sensitive listening. | Alpha ↑, moderate HbO DLPFC | Shared silence, lightness, fluid improvisation |
Rock | Fast reaction (fight/flight). Kahneman’s System 1. | Beta ↑, HbO somatosensory ↑ | Automatic responses, rigidity, error defense |
Scissors | Categorization, teaching, cutting. Kahneman’s System 2. | Frontal theta ↑, HbR in verbal areas ↑ | Critical analysis, didactic adjustments, structuring |
High-level duos migrate fluidly among these networks, but performance flourishes when Paper (Zone 2) predominates — sustaining listening, trust, and creative flow.
Belonging in Sound: From Duo to Pachamama
In a well-executed duo, musicians are not just two brains in synchrony — they are one complex system, as if they were cells of a living organism. Here, Human Quorum Sensing (QSH) reaches its highest degree: not just coordination, but full belonging, like the parts that compose Pachamama — the living Earth.
This belonging is visceral, bioelectrical, and affective. It is the same belonging that governs coral colonies, bird flocks, and underground mycelial networks. Playing in duo is tuning into this planetary belonging.
In the real duo, there are no two. There is one. One sensitive sonic organism, learning, erring, adjusting, and remaking itself in real time. Pachamama in the form of music.
Conclusion
The duo teaches us that full consciousness does not lie in dominating sound but in listening together. It is a microcosm of Pachamamic intelligence — living, interdependent, metabolically sensitive.
This relational field fosters new ways of thinking, creating, and existing. If we are to imagine a more empathic politics, a more plural science, or a spirituality without dogma — the duo can be our living laboratory.
Footnotes – Core Concepts
Zone 2: Physiological state of relaxed attention with SpO₂ between 92–94% and stable HRV. Supports flow, improvisation, and trust.
Human Quorum Sensing (QSH): Capacity to adapt decisions in response to others’ bioaffective presence. In duos, it forms the field of deep relational attunement.
Pachamamic Belonging: Advanced stage of QSH in which the self ceases to be “part” and becomes “the whole in action,” like forests, coral reefs, or musical bodies.
Apus: Extended proprioception — the sense of one’s body projected into another’s. Crucial in nonverbal listening.
Tensional Selves: Embodied states regulated by muscular, visceral, and bioelectrical tensions.
Connectome Groupings (Paper, Rock, Scissors): Metaphors for functional brain states:
Paper: flow and improvisation (Zone 2);
Rock: fight/flight rigidity (System 1);
Scissors: categorical analysis (System 2).
References
Mueller et al. (2021). Neural synchrony during musical duet performance: A hyperscanning EEG study. NeuroImage, 236, 118041.
Chabin et al. (2022). fNIRS hyperscanning of musical duos: Interbrain coupling in improvisation. Scientific Reports, 12, 5324.
Khalfa et al. (2020). Heart rate variability and musical interaction: The physiology of empathy in duet performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1032.
Koelsch, S. (2020). Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(10), 595–605.
Zamm et al. (2021). The interpersonal phase entrainment of oscillatory brain activity in musical duos. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1–2), 78–89.
El Grito de la Neurociencia Decolonial – Entre la Evidencia y el Pertenecer - FALAN SfN Brain Bee
The Cry of Decolonial Neuroscience – Between Evidence and Belonging - SfN Brain Bee FALAN
O Grito da Neurociência Decolonial – Entre Evidência e Pertencimento - SBNeC SfN Brain Bee
Fruição e Zona 2 - A Base Neuroafetiva da Performance em Unidade - SBNeC Brain Bee Ideas SfN 2025
The Valley of Lost Souls – Decolonial Neuroscience in N2 Sleep Stage
El Valle de las Almas Perdidas – Neurociencia Decolonial en los estudios del Sueño fase N2
The Valley of Lost Spirits – Decolonial Neuroscience in N1 Sleep Stage
El Valle de los Espíritus Perdidos – Neurociencia Decolonial en los estudios del Sueño fase N1
O Vale das Almas Perdidas - Neurociências Decolonial nos estudos de Sono fase N2
O Vale dos Espíritos Perdidos - Neurociências Decolonial nos estudos de Sono fase N1
7 de Setembro – A Independência Que Nunca Foi - Hora de Decolonizar o Planeta 01
Multimodal NIRS EEG - Decolonial Neuroscience
#Decolonial
#Neuroscience
#DREXcidadão
#NeuroBelong
#Zone2Mind
#TensionalMe
#DanaSpirit
#SleepNStage
#NirsAndEegs
#ApusDesigns
#FruitionNow
#LostValley
#ThinkBodies
#PIX
#DREX
